References:[1] Ficarra V cipla tadacip.

References:[1] Ficarra V, Novara G, W Artibani, retropubic, laparoscopic and robot – assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. EUR Urol cipla tadacip . 2009:55 :1037-1063.[2] Boscolo – Berto R.[ Clinical testing and evidence-based medicine: when the absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence]. G Ital Nefrol. 2009:26 : 417[3] Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. EUR Urol. 2007:51 :45-55, the 56th debate[4] Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, long term consequencese surgical margins after laparoscopic robot supported radical prostatectomy. 2009:182 :2682-2688.[5] Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. 2007:178 :2385-2389, discussion 2389-2390.[6] Sofer M, Hamilton – Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. 2002:167 :2453-2456.[7] KC Zorn, ON Gofrit, Steinberg GP, Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008:22 :1303-1309.[8] O Yossepowitch, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. EUR Urol. 2009:55 :87-99.[9] Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia:. A feasibility study Urology. 2005:66 :1261-1265.[10] Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D. To think thate surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU Int. 2008:102 :603-608.

While Kaul et al. Reported that the preservation of the prostatic fascia feasible feasible, without the surgical margins and enables better preservation of neural tissue during robotic prostatectomy with an apparent increase potency[9], Liss et al. Reported that increase nerve-sparing surgery, the prices of PSM extraprostatic prostate cancer[10].

References:[1] Ficarra V, Novara G, W Artibani, retropubic, laparoscopic and robot – assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. EUR Urol cipla tadacip . 2009:55 :1037-1063.[2] Boscolo – Berto R.[ Clinical testing and evidence-based medicine: when the absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence]. G Ital Nefrol. 2009:26 : 417[3] Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. EUR Urol. 2007:51 :45-55, the 56th debate[4] Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, long term consequencese surgical margins after laparoscopic robot supported radical prostatectomy. 2009:182 :2682-2688.[5] Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. 2007:178 :2385-2389, discussion 2389-2390.[6] Sofer M, Hamilton – Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. 2002:167 :2453-2456.[7] KC Zorn, ON Gofrit, Steinberg GP, Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2008:22 :1303-1309.[8] O Yossepowitch, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. EUR Urol. 2009:55 :87-99.[9] Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia:. A feasibility study Urology. 2005:66 :1261-1265.[10] Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D. To think thate surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU Int. 2008:102 :603-608.

While Kaul et al. Reported that the preservation of the prostatic fascia feasible feasible, without the surgical margins and enables better preservation of neural tissue during robotic prostatectomy with an apparent increase potency[9], Liss et al. Reported that increase nerve-sparing surgery, the prices of PSM extraprostatic prostate cancer[10].

Other entries from category "medicine":

Random entries